702-707-7000 Schedule Your Free Consultation Check My Case Status

Latest Blog Posts

  • man looking out the window of a nursing home

    NURSING HOME NEGLECT DURING COVID-19

    It’s 2021, but with more than 400k deaths and millions of positive tests, COVID-19 is still wreaking havoc on the nation. While this has been a tough time for everyone, no group of people has been hit harder than the elderly population. The coronavirus is known to cause more complications and increase the risk of…

    Read More

  • lawyer and doctor discussing medical lawsuit

    WHAT DOES IT TAKE TO WIN A MEDICAL MALPRACTICE CASE IN NEVADA?

    Sometimes, a visit to a doctor can cause more harm than it does good. Every day, Las Vegas medical malpractice lawyers are swamped with calls from people who have suffered injuries due to negligent or careless actions committed by a healthcare professional. Fortunately, Nevada medical malpractice laws offer a way to recoup damages caused by…

    Read More

  • man smoking e cigarette

    UNDERSTANDING THE DANGERS OF JUUL

    Once a darling of “Silicon Valley,” Juul Labs Inc.’s valuation has since plummeted from more than $38 billion to a poultry $4.6 billion in comparison. Much of the lost value is due to well-documented public health concerns for kids, teenagers, and young adults. The mission of Juul clearly states that its goal is to help…

    Read More

  • woman sitting on the chair

    CAN I SUE FOR BEING THE VICTIM OF HUMAN TRAFFICKING?

    Fifty years from now, human trafficking may be seen as one of the biggest tragedies of this era. Currently, there are a suspected 20-40 million human trafficking victims worldwide. Unfortunately, that number has been expanding in recent years.  With this information in mind, you may be curious about what the United States, and more specifically,…

    Read More

  • Woman opening up box to see the product is damaged

    THREE TYPES OF DEFECTS THAT CAN MAKE A PRODUCT DANGEROUS

    If you or a loved one has recently suffered an injury due to a product, the manufacturer may be liable.  These types of personal injury cases are referred to as product liability suits.  They’re not simple or straightforward cases and, therefore, require an experienced and skilled lawyer to help you get good results.    What you…

    Read More

  • Woman and Man wearing masks during a meeting.

    PERSONAL INJURY LAWSUITS AND COVID-19

    The COVID-19 pandemic has radically changed many aspects of life in the United States. From wearing masks in grocery stores, to cancelling 4th of July celebrations and closing down businesses, Americans have suffered significant financial damages and emotional pain over the past 18 months.  The pandemic has also permanently changed many aspects of life and…

    Read More

What’s the Latest

The latest blog posts.

WHAT IS A 1983 ACTION?

WHAT IS A 1983 ACTION?

Posting Date: April 14, 2022

A “1983 action” refers to a civil lawsuit filed under section 1983 of the United States Code. This section provides individuals with the ability to sue state or local officials, including police officers and prison guards, who violate their constitutional rights. In simpler terms, it means that if a government employee, such as a police officer or prison guard, violates your constitutional rights, you can sue them for damages in a federal civil court.

The 1983 action is a powerful tool for individuals who have had their constitutional rights violated by government employees. This includes cases of police brutality, wrongful imprisonment, and violations of due process. The section was enacted in 1871 as part of the Civil Rights Act and was originally intended to provide protection for newly freed slaves. However, since then, it has been used to protect the civil rights of all individuals. One of the most famous examples of a 1983 action is the case of Rodney King. In 1991, Rodney King was beaten by Los Angeles police officers following a high-speed chase. The beating was captured on video and sparked widespread outrage. In the aftermath, King filed a 1983 action against the police officers involved. The case went to trial, and the officers were ultimately acquitted of criminal charges. However, King was awarded $3.8 million in damages in his civil suit. Another example of a 1983 action is the case of Terence Crutcher. In 2016, Crutcher, an unarmed black man, was shot and killed by a police officer in Tulsa, Oklahoma. The officer was charged with manslaughter but was ultimately acquitted. Crutcher’s family filed a 1983 action against the city and the police department, alleging that the officer’s actions violated Crutcher’s constitutional rights. The case was settled for $6 million. A third example of a 1983 action is the case of Albert Florence. In 2005, Florence was arrested on a warrant for an unpaid fine. During his processing at a county jail in New Jersey, he was subjected to two strip searches. Florence sued the jail officials, arguing that the strip searches violated his Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. The case went all the way to the Supreme Court, which ultimately ruled in favor of the jail officials.

While the 1983 action is a powerful tool for individuals seeking justice for constitutional violations, it is not without its limitations. One of the biggest limitations is the doctrine of qualified immunity. This doctrine provides government officials with immunity from civil lawsuits for actions taken in the course of their official duties unless their actions violate “clearly established” constitutional rights. This means that even if a government official violates your constitutional rights, they may not be held liable if those rights were not “clearly established” at the time of the violation.

In recent years, there has been significant debate over the doctrine of qualified immunity and whether it should be reformed or abolished. Critics argue that the doctrine allows government officials to escape accountability for their actions, even when those actions are clearly unconstitutional. Proponents of the doctrine argue that it is necessary to protect government officials from frivolous lawsuits and to ensure that they can carry out their duties without fear of being sued.

Despite its limitations, the 1983 action remains an important tool for individuals seeking justice for constitutional violations. It allows individuals to hold government officials accountable for their actions and to seek compensation for the harm they have suffered. Whether or not the doctrine of qualified immunity is reformed or abolished, the 1983 action will continue to play an important role in protecting the civil rights of individuals in the United States. At Paul Padda Law, our lawyers are highly experienced in handling civil rights cases of all types. If you’re thinking about a 1983 action or some other type of civil rights case, give us a call today at (702) 707-3000. Civil rights cases can be difficult. For this reason, having the right lawyer by your side is very important. Give us a call and let us help you.

Employment Ideas | Paul Padda Law

Collecting Unemployment Benefits in Nevada

Did you or someone you know recently lose a job in Nevada? If so, you may be entitled to unemployment benefits. The purpose of unemployment benefits is to provide compensation to former employees who are unable to work at this time, but not as a result of the employee’s own choices. While many of the…

Read More

Las Vegas Mass Shooting

Paul Padda Law Enlightens Vegas Shooting Victims on Possible Path to Answers

Attorney Paul Padda gives his perspective on what it will take for personal injury and wrongful death victims to get the information they need to make sense of this unfortunate tragedy, reports www.paulpaddalaw.com. FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE (Las Vegas, NV)–On October 1, 2017, shortly after 10:00 P.M., a gunman who has since been identified as 64-year-old Stephen Paddock…

Read More

The Department of the VA

5 Things You Need to Know Before Suing the Veterans Administration

It’s sad, but many veterans are coming home from the wars overseas and not getting the treatment they deserve. However, suing the Veterans Administration for medical malpractice is not an easy proposition; it is, after all, a branch of the federal government, which means there are complications that arise in seeking compensation for wrongdoings. That…

Read More